Saving Mueller (and more) - Hallo friendsDARMO NEWS TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Saving Mueller (and more), We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article culture, Article economy, Article health, Article healthy tips, Article news, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Saving Mueller (and more)
link : Saving Mueller (and more)

Saving Mueller (and more)

Signing a petition may not seem like much, but it's something you can do right now. So do it.

Despite the anti-Mueller propaganda blitz, the majority of Americans still favor his efforts:

56% of Americans think Trump's public statements on the Russia probe have been mostly or completely false

47% of Americans approve of Mueller's handling of the Russia probe vs. 34% who disapprove

Thirty-four percent means that the only people who are buying the Fox party line are the Trumpian hard core. That said, 47% approval is dangerously low; we can't let the number drop further. Fox propaganda can have a subtle effect on the thinking of average citizens who don't necessarily vote Republican. People start to think: "There must be something genuinely reeky about that person they are attacking, even if I can't specify what that something is."

Here's the problem: While most Americans understand that Fox is slanted, they do not yet understand that Fox lies.

It's time for Democrats to apply some variant of the "fake news" sobriquet to Fox.

First to go. The Palmer Report believes that the first head on the chopping block will be FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

For weeks, Fox News and other pro-Trump propaganda outlets have been falsely accusing Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe of being some kind of secret operative for Hillary Clinton. This is based on no evidence of any kind, but that never matters to these types. Trump has eagerly bought into this conspiracy and has launched Twitter attacks on McCabe several times. In Trump’s delusional mind, it’s McCabe who’s somehow really out to get him, as he continues to believe that Hillary is somehow the architect of his demise from afar.

This week Donald Trump has also begun taking shots at McCabe on Twitter. Congressman Trey Gowdy, a corrupt Trump shill, couldn’t contain his excitement and ended up bragging to the media that he believes McCabe will be fired soon.

There has to be a deeper reason for this barrage of anti-McCabe paranoia. A tactical reason. He doesn't have any direct power over Mueller. So...what is it? Exactly how would the destruction of McCabe aid Trump's chances of survival?

For days now, I've presumed that Rosenstein would be yanked during the Christmas holiday. Now I'm not so sure. Maybe I've made an insufficient check of the right-wing blogosphere (can you blame me for limiting my time there? That place is toxic), but there seem to be relatively few calls for Rosenstein's execution, compared to the mob demanding McCabe's blood.

Bannon. This piece on Steve Bannon is bizarre for any number of reasons, but I was particularly struck by this passage:

The siege on Roy Moore’s campaign continued. The previous day, Ivanka Trump told the Associated Press “there’s a special place in hell for people who prey on children.” Bannon was incredulous she’d make the comment. “What about the allegations about her dad and that 13-year-old?” he said, referring to the California woman who alleged Trump raped her when she was a teen (the suit has since been dropped.)

I've always presumed that the "Katie Johnson" suit was a fake created by Team Trump, intended to deflect attention from the real sexual misdeeds in Trump's past. Yet Bannon's comment makes sense only if one presumes that the suit had validity.

Does it? Have I been wrong about this matter all along?

I heard an interview with Gloria Allred recently which convinced me that she sincerely believes in Katie's case. Allred insisted that her firm vets all such cases before taking them on. I'd like to know just how this one was vetted.

Of course, the fact that Allred believed Katie doesn't mean that we need to take Katie seriously.

Still...I'm starting to wonder...

Purity of Essence, Peace on Earth. Finally, a message from Kurt Eichenwald:

Remember: All the Nader voters preened about their purity. Then, reckless tax cuts, wars and they grew up. Now they all go "How could I have been so stupid?" The same will happen to the people who refused to meaningfully participate in 2016.

When they face consequences of knowingly deciding to play no role in the direction of government, they have to accept responsibility for treating voting as irrelevant to future govnt policy, but is about "statements." Voting for someone who cant win is narcissism.....

I'll add this: The candidate you think is so freakin' "impure" is probably a lot better than you think -- while Bernie Sanders is as pure as an overfilled septic tank.

It all comes down to propaganda. Young people think that they can't be fooled by it. Oh yes they can. Hell, they're the easiest to hornswoggle.

Thus Article Saving Mueller (and more)

That's an article Saving Mueller (and more) This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Saving Mueller (and more) with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2017/12/saving-mueller-and-more.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: