Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service

Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service - Hallo friendsDARMO NEWS TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article culture, Article economy, Article health, Article healthy tips, Article news, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service
link : Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service

Read too


Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service

This news should NOT go unnoticed in the aftermath of the terror trio strike on Syria.
And please read straight through to the very end- because the substance used in the Skripal incident, according to the Swiss lab, may connect back to the false flag chemical incidents in Syria.

RT
The substance used on Sergei Skripal was an agent called BZ, according to Swiss state Spiez lab, the Russian foreign minister said. The toxin was never produced in Russia, but was in service in the US, UK, and other NATO states.  


The Swiss center sent the results to the OPCW. However, the UN chemical watchdog limited itself only to confirming the formula of the substance used to poison the Skripals in its final report without mentioning anything about the other facts presented in the Swiss document, the Russian foreign minister added. He went on to say that Moscow would ask the OPCW about its decision to not include any other information provided by the Swiss in its report.

The Swiss center mentioned by Lavrov is the Spiez Laboratory controlled by the Swiss Federal Office for Civil Protection and ultimately by the country’s defense minister. The lab is also an internationally recognized center of excellence in the field of the nuclear, biological, and chemical protection and is one of the five centers permanently authorized by the OPCW.
 A bit of background on BZ- It's not deadly, it's highly intoxicating

  • *BZ was invented by the Swiss pharmaceutical company Hoffman-LaRoche in 1951
  •  
  • *At this time the United States military investigated it along with a wide range of possible nonlethal, psychoactive incapacitating agents 
  •  
  • *By 1959 the United States Army showed significant interest in deploying it as a chemical warfare agent.[2] It was originally designated "TK", but when it was standardized by the Army in 1961 it received the NATO code name "BZ"
  •  
  • *The U.S. Army tested BZ as well as other "psycho-chemical" agents on human subjects at Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland from 1955 to 1975, according to declassified documents.[13][14]
  •  
  • Mechanism of action

  • *The characteristic that makes BZ an incapacitating rather than a toxic chemical warfare agent is its high safety margin (ICt50/LCt50) of around 40-fold (range 32 to 384 fold). It has an ID50 of 0.00616 mg per person (i.v.) with a probit slope of 9.2. The respiratory ICt50 (median incapacitating dosage) for BZ is 110 mg·min/m³ (mild activity—15 l/min rate of breathing), whereas the LCt50 is often estimated to be around 3,800–41,300 mg·min/m³.[17]
  • Detection and protection

  • *BZ is odorless and nonirritating with delayed symptoms several hours after contact.[1]
 
 Let's go back to some of the false flag chemical attacks in Syria
In January 2013, an unidentified U.S. administration official, referring to an undisclosed U.S. State Department cable, claimed that "Syrian contacts made a compelling case that Agent 15, a hallucinogenic chemical similar to BZ,[9] was used in Homs".[10]
However, in response to these reports U.S. National Security Council spokesman stated "The reporting we have seen from media sources regarding alleged chemical weapons incidents in Syria has not been consistent with what we believe to be true about the Syrian chemical weapons program".[8][11] The chemical was also allegedly used in the August 2013 Ghouta attacks.[12]
The claim by the US National Security Council is interesting- In a nutshell they are saying since Syria didn't have Agent 15/BZ that the chemical weapons attack could not have been conducted with this substance-  

BUT, that's an obfuscation,  with the built in assumption that the Assad government was the perpetrator. The reality being if the Usrael backed rebels had been given or provided with this substance, they could have used it themselves to create a false flag chemical attack scenario to blame on the Assad government. BZ could explain the incapacitation seen in many of the videos- along with the difficulty breathing.


Thus Article Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service

That's an article Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2018/04/swiss-lab-says-bz-toxin-used-in.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Swiss lab says ‘BZ toxin’ used in Salisbury, not produced in Russia, was in US & UK service"

Post a Comment