Title : Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'...
link : Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'...
Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'...
Cancel culture strikes again.
The director of M.I.T.’s prestigious Media Lab stepped down on Saturday after an outcry over his financial ties with the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, whose contributions to the proudly contrarian lab roiled and divided its members.This decision occurred in response to this piece by Ronan Farrow, toward whom my feelings are mixed.
Dozens of pages of e-mails and other documents obtained by The New Yorker reveal that, although Epstein was listed as “disqualified” in M.I.T.’s official donor database, the Media Lab continued to accept gifts from him, consulted him about the use of the funds, and, by marking his contributions as anonymous, avoided disclosing their full extent, both publicly and within the university. Perhaps most notably, Epstein appeared to serve as an intermediary between the lab and other wealthy donors, soliciting millions of dollars in donations from individuals and organizations, including the technologist and philanthropist Bill Gates and the investor Leon Black.You can guess how the Fox Newsers are covering this. The most recent comment on this story is very predictable:
Hillary next. Lock her up.I can't resist directing your attention to another exchange in that thread. A non-rightwinger wandered into Fox-land and offered the following perfectly true observation:
Fox ignores the fact that Trump was an associate of this predator.The response:
Because only CNN makes things up. Maybe peddle your fake stuff over there?Of course, the relationship between Trump and Epstein is well-known and firmly established. Virginia Roberts/Giuffre was working for Trump at Mar-A-Lago when Ghislaine Maxwell (another Trump friend) recruited her for Epstein's harem. Virginia's father was, and may still be, a Trump employee. (From what little I've been able to gather, Dad seems like a piece of work.)
I can't understand why Virginia -- or her spooked-up lawyers -- carefully kept the names "Trump" and "Mar-A-Lago" out of her original Complaint. I also can't understand why nobody in the media ever thinks to ask Virginia about that.
If you really believe that Ghislaine Maxwell could recruit Trump employees at Mar-A-Lago without Trump's knowledge, you must be the sort of person who watches Fox religiously.
Let's get back to the M.I.T. controversy.
Should Ito have resigned? I don't think so. There's an old Latin saying: Pecunia non olet. Money doesn't stink. Epstein not only had a lot to donate, he was the gate through which millions flowed from other donors. If institutions like M.I.T. were allowed to take money only from the morally pure, those institutions would vanish, and so would civilization itself.
Look, nobody can call me an Epstein apologist. I was trying to draw attention to the Epstein case well before most people even heard of the guy. But I'd rather see Epstein's cash transferred to M.I.T.'s bank account than continue to fester Epstein's bank account. If Al Capone dropped a few grand into the hands of the local Salvation Army (and for all I know, he may have done just that), should the Salvation Army hand the money back?
(That's a trope encountered in any number of old movies: A whole buncha tainted money finding its way into the charity box.)
As much as I detest what Epstein did, I don't presume that everyone who ever talked to the guy now has cooties. Such presumptions can be -- have been, will be -- weaponized by pro-Trump propagandists (and by the many feminist dolts who enable said propagandists). I've seen quite a few moral panics over the years, and lemme tell ya: They never turn out well.
This "guilt by association" shit can get pretty damned ugly.
When I was a boy, I met Susan Atkins before the great unpleasantness. (At least, I'm pretty sure it was Susan Atkins.) She was nice. Talking to her for a pleasant hour back in the late 1960s didn't turn me into a homicidal maniac. Yet many conspiracy buffs would have jumped to that very conclusion, which is why I never mentioned that pleasant hour at any time during in the 1990s. (That was the decade when I foolishly hung out with many conspiracy buffs.)
Will the coming Big Smear against Clinton make use of video evidence? Take a look at the video embedded above. Now imagine how convincing this tech would be when combined with "testimony" from one of Epstein's girls.
When Clinton gets hit by that one-two punch, any denial will be dismissed out of hand. Many in the so-called "liberal" media will write long articles based on a simple premise: "Monica, therefore pedophilia." Because that's what passes for logic these days. At least, that's the sort of twisted logic we may expect whenever the name "Clinton" is mentioned.
Obviously, the coming Clinton smear will be used to tarnish the entire Democratic party. That's how Trump will achieve re-election. Biden has a silly little secret of his own, and it's bound to come out. When it does, rumors of pedophilia will probably start circulating a week or two later. There need not be any evidence, of course. In a time of moral panic, who needs evidence?
Could Biden himself be the subject of a fake "Epstein" tape? It's possible! If the smear merchants can link Obama to Epstein, they can certainly do the same to Biden or any other Democrat.
The fake Obama photo is very well done, in my opinion. I view that job as a brief preview of the Big Smear which is going to bring down the Democratic party.
We already have seen any number of stories which assert that Bill Clinton took a jet called "The Lolita Express" to Epstein's island. This, despite the fact that the flight logs do not show Clinton ever going to that island; all of the flights went to conferences and meetings which were covered by the news. The trips took place before Epstein was exposed. The jet was not called "The Lolita Express" until after Epstein's conviction.
But none of that matters. Facts are less important than our society's Rule Number One: When it comes to the Clintons, it's okay to tell any lie you please.
I follow Vicky Ward's Twitter feed pretty regularly. But I'm quite sure that when the Big Smear hits, she'll fall for it wholeheartedly. So will a lot of other progs.
Thus Article Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'...
That's an article Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'... This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'... with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2019/09/epstein-more-signs-that-big-smear-is.html
0 Response to "Epstein: More signs that the Big Smear is a-comin'..."
Post a Comment