"As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth."

"As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth." - Hallo friendsDARMO NEWS TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth.", We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article culture, Article economy, Article health, Article healthy tips, Article news, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth."
link : "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth."

Read too


"As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth."


The very concept of sprawl is pre-determined by available space. No space, no sprawl. It leads to a larger point, about place versus non-place.

My, how I detest auto-erotic automobile supremacy.

Visualizing Place vs. Non-Place, by Daniel Herriges (Strong Towns)

It started with an actual, attention-grabbing point. Then, as is the way of all things Internet, it became a snarky meme. As is also the way of all things Internet, the meme has more to it than meets the eye.

A few years ago, our good friend Steve Mouzon (author of The Original Green) shared this graphic on his blog: a juxtaposition of the Renaissance-era core of Florence, Italy with a single freeway interchange in Atlanta, Georgia. It has made the rounds repeatedly in various urbanist and transportation circles ever since.

Mouzon’s graphic (above) is intended to make a point about the gargantuan amount of land consumed by automobile infrastructure, particularly when it’s intended for high-speed driving. Speed requires wider turn radii, wider lanes, wider medians and shoulders, and buffer space to separate people and buildings from that fast, deadly traffic. The result: the same land area that could accommodate a bustling urban district of tens of thousands (Florence in 1425 had an estimated population of 60,000) is easily consumed by a single interchange.

Supersize that to the scale of a metro area like Atlanta’s, with all of its similar freeways and subsidiary feeder stroads, and you have a place where the actual destinations people want to get to are pushed so far apart by all this road space that it becomes inconceivable to travel between them without a car—necessitating even more land-hogging car infrastructure, in a vicious cycle.

Whatever “human scale” is—one imagines medieval Florence qualifies—it sure ain’t our modern highways ...


Thus Article "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth."

That's an article "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth." This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article "As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth." with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2019/11/as-rule-of-thumb-places-create-wealth.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""As a rule of thumb, places create wealth. Non-places consume wealth.""

Post a Comment