Title : Why Trump will win: Another example
link : Why Trump will win: Another example
Why Trump will win: Another example
Stop kidding yourself. There is no hope.The hearings were a disaster for Trump, yet support for impeachment has dropped. How does he do it? In large part, he succeeds because the right-wing alternative media infrastructure has become so powerful and so shameless, truth is no longer truth.
Here's an example. It's a piece by propagandist Scott Johnson on the Steele Dossier -- because, in right-wing mythology, it all comes down to the dossier. And never mind the fact that, before Steele even began work, Paul Ryan was recorded confessing that Trump takes money from the Russians. The FBI inquiry began well before Steele
In Rightwingerland, Fusian GPS is and always has been a Democrats-only operation. Never mind the fact that Republicans originally hired them to do oppo research on Trump. Johnson does note that Fusion was multaneously looking for info to undo the Magnitsky Act, but dows not draw the obvious conclusion: Fusion is an equal-opportunity investigation service that does the job it is paid to do.
Johnson also notes the existence of the Trump Tower meeting without bothering to address the obvious question: Why is oppo research acceptable when Trump does it but unacceptable when a Dem does it?
In April 2016 the Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Commmittee hired Fusion GPS “to build a Trump-Russia echo chamber,” as Lee Smith puts it in The Plot Agains the President. Simpson promptly circulated allegations of corrupt Russian ties to the Trump campaign to the mainstream media.What a lie! The Dossier wase not circulated until after the election. How could Fusion build an "echo chamber" while keeping the Dossier secret?
And yet the Trumpers probably have reconfigured their memories to accord with the version of events presented in the right-wing media. Rightist propagandists are absolutely shameless in their efforts to revise history. It's "Saddam planned 9/11" all over again.
If the Steele Dossier is what it purports to be, Steele picked up the phone in June 2016 and called his old sources high up in the Putin administration.Is Johnson out of his feakin' mind? Steele never claimed that! He did not call up people in the Putin administration and asked "What can you tell me about Trump?" For chrissakes, that's not how you gather intelligence!
Eager to lend a hand, they helpfully provided the allegations of treasonous collusion that we now know to be a lie.We know no such thing. If Johnson could support that claim with evidence, he would have provided the evidence. We do know that Mueller found ample evidence of obstruction of justice; one does not obstruct justice unless one is guilty. We also know that Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, fed data to a Russian intelligence officer. We know that Mueller concentrated on the official Trump campaign team, when the real dirty work was done through cut-outs.
If Trump were a Democrat, a propagandist like Johnson would not require more than the damning evidence of collusion presented here.
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.For more -- much more -- see Scott Abramson's Proof of Collusion. Note that the Dossier plays no role in any of this.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
During the course of 2016, Trump Campaign associates failed to report any of the Russian/WikiLeaks overtures to federal law enforcement, publicly denied any contacts with Russians/WikiLeaks, and actively encouraged the public to doubt that Russia was behind the hacking and distribution of stolen emails.
Thus Article Why Trump will win: Another example
That's an article Why Trump will win: Another example This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Why Trump will win: Another example with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2019/11/why-trump-will-win-another-example.html
0 Response to "Why Trump will win: Another example"
Post a Comment