James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?

James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith? - Hallo friendsDARMO NEWS TODAY, In the article you read this time with the title James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article culture, Article economy, Article health, Article healthy tips, Article news, Article politics, Article sports, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?
link : James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?

Read too


James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?

Oh god, this is hilarious: James "Bond" O'Keefe tried one of his ratfucking ops against the Washington Post, selling a fake abuse story in which Roy Moore supposedly assaulted an underaged girl. But the WP quickly figured out that they were being scammed, thanks to the ludicrously poor tradecraft of the O'Keefe crew.
The scam collapsed for a number of reasons. His fake source provided a flimsy cover story with odd details — she claimed to have only spent a few summers in Alabama, but provided a cell phone with an Alabama area code. The supposed place of employment that she provided did not have any person by that name working there. A search of her name turned up a social-media post in which she explained that she was going to “work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt [sic] of the liberal MSM.”
But there's another reason why the scam fell apart. Turns out the O'Keefians really believe in their own fantasies about the opposition:
Another reason O’Keefe’s plot collapsed again is because it is premised on a ludicrously false worldview. The Washington Post does not, in fact, publish unverified accusations just because they’re against Republicans. His various attempts to prove rampant voter fraud have failed in part because voter fraud is not rampant.
Nevertheless, Gateway Pundit is trying to pretend that the O'Keefe is the offended party here. I kid you not. These sickos are sick, and nothing can heal their diseased brains. They really do believe that all events are masterminded by Evil Soros, who answers only to the discarnate spirit of Adam Weishaupt.

O'Keefe's latest operation proves, once again, my point about the "Believe Women" movement. Disguised conservative/nationalist ratfuckerson invaded leftwing forums (such as Kos and DU) and pushed the myth that Women Never Lie Because All Women Are Pure and Incorruptible. Well, James O'Keefe had female co-conspirators in his scheme against the WP.

Keep that fact in mind as you weigh the claims made against Franken -- and as you weigh the claims to come.

Speaking of which: Keith Olbermann is out. He decided to declare victory (VERY prematurely) and to quit. He has not only retired his GQ comments, he says that he will no longer offer political commentary of any kind. He's even unfollowing political Twitter accounts. Seems pretty extreme. My guess: He'll be the next target of "abuse" accusations. Or maybe he cut a deal: I'll go away if you don't air my dirty laundry.

We all have secrets. I have no idea what Olbermann's secrets might be, but...we all have secrets. On November 22, he tweeted:
My God my phone case just melted from the volume of texts about three separate rumors of big name sexual harassment/misconduct around media. Pro tip: Nobody take Thanksgiving off.
I took this tweet seriously at the time, yet Thanksgiving came and went without the predicted three scandals. I wondered: Why would anyone send these warnings to Keith Olbermann and no-one else? How could these rumors remain a matter of text messages without bleeding out onto the internet?

At first, I thought that the target must be someone on MSNBC, since Olbermann got into a tiff with that organization. Now I'm thinking that Keith himself is one of the three.

No matter what Olbermann says in his final message, don't take this turn of events at face value. My prediction is that Trump will survive until 2020, and perhaps beyond. (That's why Franken was removed from the field of play now.) Yet Olbermann will not return.

You should check out the Trumpist replies to Olbermann's (apparently final) message. Fascism is hard to define but easy to spot. Those tweets are fascism.

A modest proposal. The latest O'Keefe outrage reminded me of a thought that's been lurking in the back of my mind for a while now. Why not turn these tactics against the neofascist right?

We all saw how quickly Alex Jones starting whining and apologizing like a candy-ass snowflake bitch the moment Chobani and Comet Pizza started making serious lawsuit noises. It would be easy to mislead Infowars, Gateway Pundit, Drudge or Breitbart with some "scoop" designed to feed into their preconceptions. Remember: They really believe in their insane conspiracy theories, and that belief can be used against them.

I propose a counter-O'Okeefe operation to feed the right what they want to hear -- about Hillary, about CNN, about some other person or institution hated by the right. Take care to "backstop" the claims with seemingly-credible witnesses and evidence. Bait them into publishing libel.

Then the offended party (who should have no link to anyone involved with the sting operation) should sue those who have published libels.

Do NOT accept any apologies or settlement offers. SUE TO KILL. SUE TO KILL. SUE TO KILL.

Will Alex Jones and his compatriots fall for such a ploy? Of course. In the first place, Alex Jones is not a bright man. In the second place, he and his comrades are conspiracy theorists, a breed of cat I know well. Conspiracy theorists are drug addicts, which means that they have an insatiable need for a new high. They will never be able to stop themselves from publishing anything that gives them the rush they crave.

This is their one great weakness. Exploit it.

I have some further advice for anyone who wants to conduct this proposed operation: Make sure that the personnel in the field have established suitable online legends. In other words, don't make the mistake recently made by James O'Keefe, Master of Deceipt. Always remember that even the walls have ears, and that Uncle Vlad has the longest ears of all. Don't trust sensitive information/instructions to text messages or emails; many things are best said mouth-to-ear, in whispers. At all times, strive to find the right balance between these two maxims: Fortune favors the bold and Paranoia is your friend.


Thus Article James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?

That's an article James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith? with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2017/11/james-okeefe-master-of-deceipt-plus-who.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "James O'Keefe, Master of "Deceipt." Plus: Who got to Keith?"

Post a Comment