Title : Why Trump will win
link : Why Trump will win
Why Trump will win
Over the years, some of my readers have expressed a distaste for Bill Maher. I, too, get pissed at him on occasion -- especially when he disses the Clintons or praises Bernie -- yet increasingly, he's the only liberal I can stand. He's also the only Democrat whose voice occasionally penetrates into the right.
Here, he makes the same point I've tried to make repeatedly: Democracy is a popularity contest. Unfortunately, progressives always insist that we choose the less-popular option. It's a sick obsession.
Allow me to offer several illustrations.
Atheism. As of 2014, atheists constituted all of 3.1 percent of the American population. Many within that small percentage were Dawkins-esque "new atheists" who have always tended to mix atheism with libertarianism. In more recent times, many drinkers of Dawkins/Rothbard cocktail made the all-too-familiar shift from libertarianism to fascism -- and in the process, some of these former God-haters came to embrace very orthodox forms of religiosity.
Yet Democratic Underground routinely features pro-atheism posts while denigrating the major Christian denominations. Would Elijah Cummings have approved?
Let me repeat: Only 3.1 percent of Americans identify as atheists.
"Three-point-one percent? Let's go there!" sayeth the Dems.
Feminism did much good during its first wave or two, but it has now become odious. The polls are consistent and clear: Most people -- most women -- dislike feminism: Only 38 percent of females embrace the label, as do only 22 percent of men.
Americans favor gender equality by wide margins (as do I), but they also understand that -- despite claims to the contrary -- feminism and the advocacy of gender equality are two very different things. In our universities, under the evil influence of the postmodernists, the term "feminism" has lost its original meaning: The word may now be defined as "Toxic Anti-Masculinity." Alternative definitions: "The reflexive blaming of one's own failures on all males" or as simple "Hatred of males."
When reminded that the label has become repellent, feminists reflexively blame the mythical concepts of "patriarchy" and "brainwashing." The simple fact is that most women don't hate males. They love their brothers, fathers, sons, husbands and lovers -- which is why most women will never embrace feminism. Americans have learned to hate feminism because the movement has been taken over by neurotics, by the perpetually and unrighteously angry, by control freaks, by sexually dominant females who'd be better off paying dues at the local BDSM club, and by lesbians who use quasi-political casuistry to seduce naive young women.
(And don't you fucking dare try to tell me that that doesn't happen. I've heard first-hand testimony on multiple occasions.)
Let me repeat: Only 30 percent of Americans identify as feminists.
"Thirty percent? Let's go there!" sayeth the Dems.
Gender Dysphoria. Despite the current trendiness of gender flexibility among the young, the fact remains that gender dysphoria occurs in only about 0.5 percent of the population. Nobody knows if the cause is psychological, cultural or genetic, although some evidence suggests that the trait is heritable.
I do not wish the transgendered ill. In fact, Jeanne d'Arc -- the historical figure I most admire -- was among their number. (Legally speaking, she went to the stake because she refused to wear female clothing. Don't even think of arguing with me: I'm better read on this topic than you are. Unless your name is Bonnie Wheeler.) If I had a daughter, I would have no problem if she followed Jeanne's example.
That said, I'm not going to preface my writings by listing my pronouns. If you insist that I must -- fuck you.
You can't ask 99.5 percent of the population to inconvenience themselves just to make 0.5 percent of the population feel better about themselves. The vast majority of that 99.5 percent simply won't do as you insist, no matter how loudly you caterwaul. So whatcha gonna do about that? Do you really think you're going to punch me out until I comply with your demands? I'll punch back. Whatcha gonna do then? Try to understand one simple fact: You simply have no power over me. And you have no power over the 99.5 percent of the population with whom I stand.
Similarly: If you insist on spouting the trendy proposition that gender has nothing to do with biology -- fuck you. That is to say: Feel free to spew whatever metaphysical concepts you find pleasing, but you must understand that most people won't buy into that idea until you offer proof. I'm talking real proof, scientific proof, the kind you see on a microscope slide. the kind discussed in refereed journals. (Actual journals, not these shams.) So far, all I've heard is absurd postmodernist rhetoric and name-calling.
I'm quite aware that the gender dysphoric have a high suicide rate. Obviously, I'd like that situation to change.
But here's what bugs the hell out of me: White heterosexual males in America have also been committing suicide at an alarmingly high rate. Yet if you mention that fact in Democratic forums, the victims will receive zero sympathy. Invariably, you'll hear condescending bullshit about "toxic masculinity." The word "butthurt" also gets tossed around a lot. If a gender dysphoric commits suicide, that's considered a MASSIVE TRAGEDY -- but if a white male kills himself, who gives a damn? Those butthurt crybabies deserve to die, because they won't bow in obeisance before their female/black/queer superiors.
Again: The transgendered are only 0.5 percent of the population. At most. Some estimates go lower.
"Zero point five percent? Let's go there!" sayeth the Dems.
An additional point: If forced to choose between constantly ego-stroking the 0.5 percent and electing enough Dems to do something about climate change, most progressives would opt to let the planet become uninhabitable. In their eyes, it is better to end the human experiment once and for all than to compromise on the idea that everyone should offer a preferred-pronoun list before writing any text.
Socialism. The most recent Harris polling indicates that 37 percent of Americans would prefer to live in a socialist country; other polls give lower numbers -- 25% and 29%. Yes, the number is growing. I suspect that socialism's increased popularity has something to do with the fact that decades of libertarian propaganda (largely funded by the Kochtopus) has managed to convince the populace that what used to be called Keynesianism is actually socialism.
I'm old enough to recall a time when most Americans automatically equated the S word to the idea of government control of industrial production. I'm also old enough to recall a time when even Richard Nixon declared himself a Keynesian (though, contrary to myth, he did not actually utter the phrase "We're all Keynesians now"). Back then, the United States was considered both the bodyguard and ultimate exemplar of capitalism.
Despite the recent shift in polling, a strong majority of Americans still bristles at any mention of the S word.
In a new Hill.TV/HarrisX American Barometer poll released Tuesday, an overwhelming majority of respondents, 76 percent, said they would not vote for a “socialist” political candidate, while only 24 percent of those polled said they would vote for a socialist candidate.
Although Sanders remains highly popular among Democratic voters (and Americans generally), in the American Barometer survey, 64 percent of Democratic respondents said they would not vote for a "socialist." Among respondents who said they voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 general election, 59 percent said they would not support a self-described socialist.If you think that you -- or Bernie Sanders, or AOC, or anyone else -- has the magic argument which can dramatically change those numbers, stop deluding yourself. Need I remind you that the electoral college gives an advantage to rural areas? In those regions, the S-word still conjures up images of mad Marxist church-burners. You're not going to counter that perception with incessant GOTV campaigns in the blue states.
Again: Only 24 percent of those polled said they would vote for a socialist candidate
"Twenty-four percent would vote for a socialist candidate? Let's go there!" sayeth the Dems.
Sometimes I'm surprised that Democrats get any votes. What are the results of insistence on progressive purity, on this infuriating obsession with wedding the party to unpopular ideas? The young are turning toward fascism in ever-greater, Democracy is in serious danger, Klan membership is on the rise, and Donald fucking Trump -- one of the worst human beings imaginable -- is the goddamned president.
What's more, he's going to be a two-termer. Essentially, the prog purists are working for Putin.
Thus Article Why Trump will win
That's an article Why Trump will win This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Why Trump will win with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2019/10/why-trump-will-win.html
0 Response to "Why Trump will win"
Post a Comment