Title : Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q?
link : Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q?
Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q?
Yesterday's most important news had nothing to do with Kamala Harris. The real newsmaker was Jeanine Pirro:The Fox News opinion host Jeanine Pirro baselessly suggested on Wednesday evening that "something's going to happen" to the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, and that it would cause the former vice president to be removed from the ballot during the presidential election in November.Listen closely to the video. You can almost hear Watters say "Don't let the cat out of the bag!"
"For some reason, I just have this feeling that Joe Biden isn't going to be on the ticket," Pirro said during a Fox News segment.
"I have a sense that something's going to happen before the election and he's not even going to be on the ticket, so don't even ask me if he's going to make the four years," she added.
As Pirro continued with her analysis on Biden's newly announced running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris, the Fox News commentator Jesse Watters could be heard in the background expressing caution.
Of course Pirro has advanced knowledge of the upcoming Big Smear. I've been sounding the alarm for months now.
At some point after he formally gets the nomination, an Epstein girl will claim that Joe Biden is a child abuser or a rapist or both. The accuser will claim that she was "raped" during one of Biden's frequent visits to the Virgin Islands. We may even hear terrifying tales involving that other island -- the one owned by Biden's brother, located just ten miles away from Epstein's.
This smear has been years in the planning. That's why QAnon has promulgated the myth of "elite pedophilia."
The purpose of Q is to set the stage for the Big Smear. At the right moment, feminists will push the same mythos on the left. Watch it happen.
Pirro is probably right: Biden will abandon the race. Kamala Harris will be the new nominee -- and she will lose, due to the tarnished Democratic brand. A re-elected Donald Trump will then use this continuing smear as an excuse to go after other Democrats.
We are in for one hell of a ride. Well-paid Epstein girls can offer an endless series of "recovered memories." It'll be the Satanic Ritual Abuse scare of the 1990s, times a million. It'll be the Harvey Matusow story times a billion. You think 2020 is bad? What scares me is the thought of 2021.
If you travel down the right-hand corridors of the internet, you'll see numerous indicators that the Big Smear is not far off. Before a political earthquake hits, there are always a few preliminary tremors.
Here's an example. Here is another.
Baxter Dmitry reports for Newspunch, April 3, 2019, that according to Paul Tatchell, a roommate of Joe Biden at the Syracuse University College of Law, Biden admitted he was sexually attracted to children.You want to hear more about this Tatchell business? This YouTube video went up not long ago. Here is the fake news article that started it all. So far as I can tell, this blog post is the only effort anyone has yet mounted to debunk the story. Even though "Paul Tatchell" seems to be imaginary, the smear-merchants continue to tell and re-tell this fable. A Big Smear is a dragon with a million mouths, and one lone debunker cannot combat such a beast.
Here we have an accusation from someone named Jessica Leigh Collins, who says that she was raped by both Biden and Epstein. She also says that she was "abducted" by the late DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey.
What bullshit! I spoke at length with Palfrey, and I feel certain that the only violent act she ever committed was the taking of her own life. Why would she want to "abduct" anyone? She had no shortage of perfectly willing women who wanted to join her stable. If she had large financial resources and a criminal network at her command, she would have relocated to a foreign country without an extradition treaty.
Again: The Collins story and the Tatchell story are just tremors. The earthquake will come when an Epstein Girl -- some of whom have proven that they will say anything for money -- gets in front of a camera and weepily claims "Joe raped me!"
The accusation will be confirmed by Ghislaine Maxwell. That's why Trump came that close to dangling a pardon in front of her. No other scenario explains why Trump said what he said.
Pirro's outburst is just the latest evidence that a lot of people on the right know all about the coming Big Smear. Only the left remains ignorant. It's an enforced ignorance: If you try to warn about the Big Smear on Kos or D.U., you'll be cancelled.
The "elite pedophilia" myth. The far-rightists and the Russians have spent years whipping up mass hysteria over "elite pedophilia." According to this myth, anyone worth a lot of money (and who doesn't support Trump) is desperate to rape a child, and even to devour a child.
Why does this ridiculous myth keep gaining adherents? Because rational people do nothing to counter it.
I've been trying to argue against Epstein-mania in various online forums, and lemme tell ya -- it's frustrating. After an hour or so, I felt like Mickey Mouse trying to bail out the castle in Fantasia. The task is hopeless.
This nation is filled with nutballs who believe that every millionaire gets a pup tent whenever a toddler toddles into view. The Q canards recapitulate all of the lies once leveled against Jews: Rape, cannibalism, Satanism, dark rituals, banking conspiracies, Hollywood...
We even hear about a magic elixer which supposedly uses the blood of children to extend life. A few websites claim that the key ingredient in this elixer is called adrenochrome. Obviously, this "magic elixer" yarn is a variant of the ancient anti-Semitic legend that Jews use the blood of children to make Matzah bread.
We are talking about official Q doctrine. Millions of people actually believe this shit. As the NYT has finally admitted, we can no longer use the term "fringe" to describe this weltanschauung.
Although not every Q fan buys into the new blood libel, a staggering number of people accept the idea that the monied want to rape and kill your kids. Question: If rich "elites" really are so obsessed with raping children, why don't we have more examples from history?
Think about it. If the "elite pedophilia" mythos had any validity, then those well-produced BBC historical documentaries should be brimming with tales of well-heeled devil-worshipping child-rapers. In fact, historians offer only a few examples. Offhand, I can think of Tiberius and his "little fishes"...and then there's Gilles de Rais, Joan of Arc's general turned Very Naughty Person...and maybe King Herod (although we don't know Salome's age)...and...
...and...
...and that's the point. There just aren't many examples. The few social scientists who have looked into pedophilia say that it is actually more common among commoners. Among the poor. Your average Alex Jones listener is more likely to rape a child than is your average country club member. Even Epstein, monster that he was, was addicted to ephebophilia, not pedophilia.
Who is Q? I remain persuaded that the Q mythos began with a group of writers linked to The Barnes Review, a journal devoted to Holocaust denialism and revisionist history. This publication sprang out of the "empire" headed by neo-Nazi magnate Willis Carto.
During the Dubya years, The Barnes Review published a column called "The Voice of the White House," which allegedly offered an insider's view of Bushian perfidy and conspiracy. Since this column was anti-Bush, naive liberals began to cite it. I warned against "The Voice" fairly often in the early days of this blog.
Q has always reminded me of "The Voice." Both QAnon and the Voice are recent incarnations of the "fake insider" ploy -- a disinformation tactic which traces back to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The Protocols proved that this gambit can literally change history.
One still wants names. Who is Q?
In the past, I have suggested that Q could be a remarkably prolific hoaxer named Peter Stahl. He's an American neo-Nazi whose name has been mentioned in the eldritch realm of high-end art forgery; apparently, his name also came up during investigations into the infamous "Hitler's diaries" hoax. (Long story.) Stahl uses many pseudonyms, the best-known of which is Gregory Douglas. Under that name, he wrote a deceptive book called Regicide, his contribution to the JFK assassination literature. My one-word review: Bullshit.
Interestingly, David Irving wrote a noteworthy takedown of Stahl. Rightwingers do fall out with each other -- and when they do, outsiders can learn a lot.
I once saw a Russian YouTube video which treated "Douglas" as though he were a legitimate historian. In all likelihood, The Barnes Review writers now have Russian funds at their disposal.
Stahl/Douglas/whoever is a master hoaxer, no doubt about it. But he is also elderly. Thus, I now lean toward the theory that most Q communications were concocted by some other happy Hitlerite who used to make his home at The Barnes Review.
There are a number of candidates. One interesting possibility: Christopher Bollyn, the man who claims to have "solved" 9/11. Spoiler alert: Jews did it.
(Are you suddenly tempted to write in with your own 9/11 theory? Feel free to waste your time. I won't publish you or even read you.)
Bollyn used to be a bigwig at the American Free Press (another Willis Carto publication), although Bollyn was ousted in one of those internal spats that split the far right from time to time. American Free Press, in turn, is a big advocate of QAnon. Worth noting: AFP has expressed interest in conspiracy theories involving the late John F. Kennedy Jr., who plays a role in the ever-growing Q mythos.
Bollyn's great rival in the world of conspiratorial surrealism was a fellow named Victor Thorn, whose real name, it seems, was Scott Makufka. Thorn would be an excellent Q candidate -- if he were still alive.
Allow me to suggest -- tentatively -- another candidate: A very strange, and very prolific, writer who now calls himself Frank Joseph.
Under another name -- Frank Collin -- he was a notorious Nazi leader who spearheaded the infamous march through Skokie, Illinois. In the TV movie Skokie, which you can probably still find on YouTube, Collin is played by a little-known actor named George Dzundza, who is terrific.
In later years, Joseph/Collin contributed to -- you guessed it -- The Barnes Review. That journal may be visualized as a giant machine that spews out fake history the way Lawrence Welk's bubble machine blew bubbles.
Joseph/Collin then switched his field of interest to Forteana, which has long had an overlap with Fascism.
Joseph has written many books devoted to the theory that -- thousands of years ago -- white people built an advanced civilization in North America, which the Indians overwhelmed. In other words, Indians committed genocide against the whites, not the other way round. This theory was once very popular in the 19th century; Andrew Jackson believed in a version of it.
The works of Frank Joseph are glowingly reviewed in the latest episode of the Fortean podcast Mysterious Universe. Good luck trying to tell the hosts of that show about the previous adventures of "Frank Joseph" as Frank Collin. On Fortean websites, the Fortean/fascism connection is the unmentionable topic; you'll be persona non grata if you bring it up.
For more on Joseph/Collin, I direct your attention to the work of a marvelous writer named Jason Colavito. See, specifically, here and here. The latter piece references QAnon. Colavito has uncovered a "set of rules" observed by writers for Q-related forums:
Avoid: 1) Aliens, 2) "Energy" fields, 3) Hollow earth, 4) Metaphysics, 5) Religions pantheons, 6) Moloch / Satan / Saturn, 7) Chemtrails, 8) Crop circles, 9) Detoxing / Cleansing Pineal Gland, 10) Chakras, 11) Reptiloids because normies will take one look at any of those and dismiss you as a nutcase.We may draw one obvious conclusion from this list: Contributors to the Q mythos are the sort of people who usually love to talk about aliens and chakras and pineal glands. But they know that they have to restrain themselves if they want to re-elect Trump.
Here's a sample of Colavito's insights into Frank Joseph/Collins:
Later, Joseph rejects the argument that hyper-diffusionism is racist because he claims that Native Americans admit in their oral traditions that superior Celtic people came to America and wowed the Natives with their sophisticated technology, remembered in myth as white sorcerers. He attributes that mounds and earthworks of the United States to the Celts, repeating at great length Mound Builder myths and claims that were fabricated in the 1700s and 1800s. “We can say with a great deal of certainty that the first Mound Builders, whom archaeologists refer to as the Adena, were Celts. They were Celtic refugees from Europe.” And yet these Celtic Europeans left behind no trace of their material culture, no European artifacts, nothing. The warrant for this claim? Joseph can’t believe that the Native Americans could have piled dirt in great heaps without white people to show them how.Let's be clear: Colavito does not endorse my suggestion that Joseph/Collin might be Q. I freely admit that this notion is blue-sky conjecture. This is my damned blog and I reserve the right to offer the occasional eccentric idea, because eccentricity-free blogging is fun-free blogging. Sometimes my off-the-wall theories turns out to be right; often, they turn out to be wrong. Either way, you must assign credit or blame to me, not to anyone else.
Could Bollyn or Collin be Q? Perhaps; probably not. But I'd bet the last dollar in my pocket that Q originated with one of the Fake History peddlers who used to nest at The Barnes Review.
Added note. Media Matters has looked into QAnon-friendly House candidate Marjorie Taylor Greene.
In previously unreported remarks, Greene discussed the September 11 attacks and said that there was “the so-called plane that crashed into the Pentagon. It's odd there's never any evidence shown for a plane in the Pentagon.”Bollyn would be proud of her.
She also denounces "chain migration." You mean like Melania's family, Marjorie?
Thus Article Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q?
That's an article Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q? with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2020/08/pirro-and-big-smear-plus-who-is-q.html
0 Response to "Pirro and the Big Smear. Plus: Who is Q?"
Post a Comment