Title : British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged?
link : British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged?
British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged?
 |
| Time to think beyond what were told |
.
WaffleStaffelApril 28, 2021 at 4:56 PMIt's over my head, Penny. Are the widely reported blood clot cases a different kind of blood clot than VITT? Does tacking on the "Vaccine-Induced" part allow them to categorize it differently to minimize the incidence?
At that time, my response was I don’t know. Today however, my response is yes. That’s exactly what I think is occurring. Different categorization to minimize all the other incidences. After reading the report from the other day about Thrombosis being more common with the experimental vaccines then acknowledged..
I came to realize that blood clots of every sort are occurring after vaccination. Anecdotally, I’ve heard of a vaccine recipient who developed blood clots in the arm that the vaccine was administered in. Then there are all the women who are reporting passing clots during menstruation after vaccination. Including women who are past that stage in their life You can read about that here ( Sorry for the ick factor fellas, but, it is what it is)
As of 5th April 2021, there have been ~958 cases of post-vaccination menstrual irregularities, including vaginal haemorrhages, that were recorded in MHRA’s adverse event reports. There were twice more cases of menstrual irregularities with CoViD Vaccine AstraZeneca than Pfizer (643 vs 315 respectively) [1]. It is anticipated that the actual numbers of cases are much higher than the numbers recorded in the pharmacovigilance systems as many women in different cultural context may have felt uncomfortable to talk about it, may not have thought that it was vaccine-related, or may have not been encouraged by their clinicians to make an official report into the adverse events reporting system.Definitely there is much more going on here then just the incidences of VITT’s and all these types of Thrombosis are occurring after vaccination ( I'm thinking there is an element of endocrine disruption going on- just my opinion based on much previous reading) There are, at this time, two cases in British Columbia, Canada of Vaccine Induced Thromobosis. One that is being claimed as such. Another that is being disregarded.
We’ll address the one that is being disregarded first-
The 36-year-old man, who Castanet is identifying with a pseudonym ‘Nathan’ to protect his employment, received the AstraZeneca vaccine at his work camp in Northern B.C. on March 23. He would then test positive for COVID-19 on March 31, prior to the vaccine becoming effective.I’d be interested to know if there were others with Covid at the work camp? Was he the only one? Are we talking about the possibility of ADE? We are already aware that ADE is a very issue with this so called vaccine- It’s a topic that been covered more then once here. I’ll link this in for convenience sake
Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trialsLet’s get back to "Nathan"
But in the weeks after the vaccine and coronavirus diagnosis, Nathan felt a growing pain in the entire length of his arm. On April 21, he visited the emergency department at Kelowna General Hospital, where doctors found an “occluding thrombus,” or major clot, in his left subclavian vein after a doppler ultrasound examination, according to medical documents reviewed by Castanet.
In a formal medical certificate to obtain Employment Insurance benefits, a doctor at the Kelowna Urgent and Primary Care Centre signed off the next day on the diagnosis made by other doctors at the hospital
In a formal medical certificate to obtain Employment Insurance benefits, a doctor at the Kelowna Urgent and Primary Care Centre signed off the next day on the diagnosis made by other doctors at the hospital
Beyond losing his sense of smell, Nathan saw next to no symptoms related to COVID-19.
“Left subclavian DVT (deep vein thrombosis) identified April 21, 2021. Had COVID-19 in March 2021. He had the AstraZeneca vaccination on March 23, 2021,” Dr. Bruce Jamieson wrote. “DVT likely due to the AstraZeneca vaccination.”
The doctor goes on to note that Nathan has been placed on blood thinners for three months and is unable to work for that time
The prevalence of blood clots related to the AstraZeneca vaccine is about one case per 100,000 (it’s much higher then that: see previous post) people vaccinated, according to the most recent data out of the U.K. where 22 million doses have been administered. The clots tend to occur between four days and two weeks after a vaccination.
The most dangerous version of clots, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), happen in the brain. Nathan's clot in the left subclavian vein was located near the confluence with the neck's jugular vein. Most of the publicity and studies associated with the link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and clots has been focused on VITT, but other types of clots can occur.And this is the point I’m getting at- And it answers WaffleStaffels question, I think? Other clots can occur with the Astra Zeneca vaccine. In fact clots can and have occurred with all the vaccines. Clots of different types. And by talking up the one, they can and are downplaying all the other equally dangerous clots. In fact a VITT has very specific criteria making it much easier to downplay all that harm that is actually taking place -Read here for that criteria
But in Nathan’s case, despite a formal diagnosis that involved multiple doctors — both Interior Health and the provincial Ministry of Health were completely unaware of Nathan’s case, which would have been at the time B.C.’s first vaccine-related clot, until they were contacted by Castanet.
That is part of the reason Nathan decided to take his story to the media.
“I just wanted it to be recognized,” he said, explaining he “just didn’t understand why” health officials were saying there had been no vaccine-related clots in B.C. when he had a signed diagnosis in writing saying otherwise.
“They just kind of gave me my medication and sent me on my way, and didn't do any followup.”
After Castanet News contacted IH and the provincial government, an investigation was launched.
“They weren't concerned about me before, now that another person is looking into it, now they are acting like they are concerned,” Nathan added.Oh those compassionate front line heroes...(After what occurred in Edmonton? No respect)
While Nathan heaped praise upon Dr. Jamieson at the Urgent and Primary Care Centre, he said the doctors who were initially dealing with him at Kelowna General Hospital were somewhat dismissive after his diagnosis.
“[The doctor] was just kind of like, ‘you know you can just do whatever you want — if something bad is going to happen, it is going to happen,’” Nathan said. “There wasn’t really any good, or real medical health advice. I didn’t leave that hospital feeling any better.”British Columbia is downplaying the aforementioned case in order to continue their experimental vaccine push- That’s how it appears to me. Which also leaves me wondering what else they’ve been ignoring, downplaying or not addressing? This man known as Nathan, is he the only other unacknowledged case? Doubtful, because I’ve been suspecting for sometime now, that BC has had to have at least a few cases... but couldn’t find any reports. Until yesterday. Then I come across two!
BC’s claimed first case, that is being acknowledged is another woman.
Woman in her 40s in stable condition and being treated in Vancouver Coastal Health region
Notice the vagueness in the report? When exactly was she vaccinated? Not mentioned. She is now stable? How long did it take to stabilize her? How long has she been in hospital? Is BC announcing this now because this woman might survive and might talk to others? Or the media?
"Henry said the affected woman, who was in her 40s and in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, is now stable, emphasizing the condition is extremely rare and can be treated. She said the woman noticed her symptoms five or six days after receiving a dose of AstraZeneca and went to her doctor, who, suspecting it might be a condition related to the vaccine, conducted a diagnostic blood test that revealed low platelet counts. "Whatever the case may be with this woman. It is not likely she is the first case of vaccine induced thrombosis in BC. She’s just the first one they’ll officially admit to. In order to downplay harm. That's how I see it!
Thus Article British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged?
That's an article British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged? with the link address https://darmonewst.blogspot.com/2021/05/british-columbia-canada-1st-vaccine.html